Wisconsin IRA Home Energy Rebates Signed in as Test user — test site only

← All applications

Multifamily HOMES Project

182 Housing Program Court, Madison 53703 · Whole multifamily building, 5 or more homes · 5 of 5 units occupied · Project code PRJ-3JL3-A732 · Submitted on the customer portal

Assigned to: Unassigned

Payment review

In progress Multifamily HOMES project 0 of 17 checks answered

Other claims on this address

No other multifamily claim is recorded on this address. The portal looked; this is not a check nobody ran.

What the documents say

Income level
Not decided yet
The qualification is approved, but the 50%-of-occupied-units rule cannot be read from the units recorded against it today, so the income level it was approved at cannot be shown here. See the working.
Savings
—
Savings in the DOE (HPXML) file
—
Measure
Not recorded
Primary heating fuel
Not recorded
Therm savings entered
Not answered
Enhanced incentives
Not answered
Disadvantaged community
Not answered
Assessment incentive paid
Not answered
Who is paid
Not recorded
Assessment report date
Not recorded
Project completion date
Not recorded
Calibration
Not recorded

Savings and the measure 0 of 5 answered

The savings decide the rebate, so all four of these have to agree with each other before anything is paid.

  • The savings are 19.5% or more.Not answered

    DOE rounds up to 20%, so 19.5% is the floor the procedure accepts.

  • The savings are in line with the measure chosen.Not answered

    The measure list runs 20-34% and 35%+, at each income level.

  • The savings match the DOE (HPXML) file within a point or two.Not answered
  • Therm savings are entered only where the fuel is natural gas.Not answered

    Any other fuel may leave the therm fields blank.

  • The savings recorded here match the savings entered in SPECTRUM.Not answered

Income and enhanced incentives 0 of 4 answered

The income level is read from this property's own qualification and the 50%-of-occupied-units rule, never typed here.

  • Low and moderate income claims show enhanced incentives as yes.Not answered
  • A disadvantaged-community property has its bonus measure present.Not answered
  • Where an assessment incentive was paid, its cost is not in the project cost.Not answered
  • Moderate and market-rate claims do not show an assessment incentive as paid.Not answered

    If one does, it goes back for correction. A low-income claim showing no is read against the rest of the account instead.

Who is paid, and what the invoice shows 0 of 3 answered

  • The payee matches SPECTRUM and Atlas.Not answered
  • The invoice shows what paying that party requires.Not answered

    Paying the contractor means an instant discount on the invoice. Paying the customer means the rebates are listed and not deducted.

  • Where the customer is paid, they are moderate income or above.Not answered

The assessment report 0 of 4 answered

  • The assessment date is within 3 years of the project completion date.Not answered
  • The report shows its calibration passed.Not answered

    A SNUGG report says so on its tech specs page. An Optimizer report may not print it, and the utility data on the report is what is read instead.

  • Every measure on the report has a line on the invoice.Not answered
  • Only approved measures contribute to the savings.Not answered

Equipment against ENERGY STAR

No model number is recorded on this claim's measures, so there is nothing to look up against ENERGY STAR.

Contractor spot-check

The day's sample did not pick this claim, so no license check is asked for. About one claim in four is picked, and the portal draws the sample rather than the reviewer.

Duplicate check 0 of 1 answered

The procedure's first step, and the reason it exists: the same property must not be paid twice.

  • No other claim on this property address is a duplicate of this one.Not answered

    Every other claim on the address is listed below, with where it has got to. A likely duplicate goes back to the Implementer.

Errors

No error has been raised on this claim.

Before this can be approved

  • The redemption review has passed (#37) Not met

    The redemption review is “In progress”. A claim reaches payment review by passing it, so this one is not ready to be paid.

  • The HOMES measure check (#32) Cannot be checked

    The portal cannot check the savings against the measure chosen yet -- that is #32, which is still being written. Until it is, whoever approves this is confirming the measure by hand, against the measure list.

The decision

This claim cannot be approved yet:

  • 17 of 17 checks are still unanswered.
  • The figures this claim is checked against are not all recorded.
  • The redemption review is “In progress”. A claim reaches payment review by passing it, so this one is not ready to be paid.

Send it back

Name every error. A send-back needs at least one, and each is kept with your name against it — that record is what replaces the error tracker and the email thread.

Checked against the procedure of 2026-09-17 — HOMES Payment Reviews (Duplicate check, Application review, Handling Application Errors), HOMES MF Assessment Incentive Application Processing Procedure, and IRA Assessment Incentive Approvals, from IRA_RnD focus_reference_docs at 373b4ca. The procedure document.

Email

Incomplete application Application closing General notification

From
irahomes@focusonenergy.com
Delivered to
matt@openwatt.io (this is test: nothing reaches an applicant, a contractor or a colleague)

Deny

They read it under the status on their application page. Leave it unticked for a note only staff should see.

Send back for more information

They read it under the status on their application page. Leave it unticked for a note only staff should see.

Assign

Control Center has no application called IRA PI/PA Portal (409), so it cannot say who has access to this portal. This list shows the people who have used this portal.

Timeline

Nothing has happened to this application yet.